SINCE SPAIN, WE OFFER TO YOU BY WRITE AND
VIDEO, THE FIRST IADCRO INTERNATIONAL
CONGRESS AGAINST THE BSL, DDA, LAW PPP, etc.
VIDEO
PRESENTACIÓN del Congreso: Don Mariano Peinado (Presidente de la FIAPBT & IADCRO) en Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/videos/10156520580791133 y en YouTube: https://youtu.be/nZGSX0hqgMk Post: https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/photos/p.10157457095996133/10157457095996133/?type=3&theater
Entrevista a Mariano Peinado de Radio 5 TODO NOTICIAS de
Radio Nacional de España.
Primer VIDEO: Don Antonio Pozuelos en Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/videos/334291757280852 Mismo VÍDEO en YouTube: https://youtu.be/HV7crwGrlcI Post: https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/photos/p.10157449427196133/10157449427196133/?type=3&theater
Segundo VIDEO:
Don Antonio
Pozuelos en
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/videos/633678150411833 Mismo VÍDEO en YouTube: https://youtu.be/WOI2SkD8nrU Post: https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/photos/p.10157451359191133/10157451359191133/?type=3&theater
Tercer VIDEO: Don Antonio Pozuelos en Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/videos/2196595913987067 Mismo VÍDEO en YouTube: https://youtu.be/SVSMkOx-t04 Post: https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/photos/p.10157454109151133/10157454109151133/?type=3&theater
Cuarto VIDEO: Doña Rosana Álvarez en Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/videos/673752969719785 Mismo VÍDEO en YouTube: https://youtu.be/njzxn9b6AHw Post: https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/photos/p.10157456613571133/10157456613571133/?type=3&theater
Quinto VIDEO: Doña Rosana Álvarez en Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/videos/503193920216550 Mismo VÍDEO en YouTube: https://youtu.be/FWtZwzLHfXo Post: https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/photos/p.10157459008781133/10157459008781133/?type=3&theater
Sexto VIDEO: Doña Rosana Álvarez En Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/videos/2203805339858707 Mismo VÍDEO en YouTube: https://youtu.be/Pxm3t-ZL09k Post: https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/photos/p.10157465933506133/10157465933506133/?type=3&theater
Séptimo VIDEO: Don Demetrio Madrid en Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/videos/585121412001575 Mismo VÍDEO en YouTube: https://youtu.be/NzhCS4rFE8w Post: https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/photos/p.10157466054801133/10157466054801133/?type=3&theater
Octavo VIDEO: Don Demetrio Madrid en Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/videos/1132505060284948 Mismo VÍDEO en YouTube: https://youtu.be/lOf4XNdyAQU Post: https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/photos/p.10157469494796133/10157469494796133/?type=3&theater
Noveno VIDEO: Don Demetrio Madrid en Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/videos/273017916813920 Mismo VÍDEO en YouTube: https://youtu.be/f1ISSdtA2ZA Post: https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/photos/p.10157472387176133/10157472387176133/?type=3&theater
In the FIRST IADCRO INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS about BSL, has been demonstrated scientifically the nonexistence of Dangerous or Potentially Dangerous breeds dogs. http://www.iadcro.com/informationcongress.html
IADCRO
METHOD. THE
IMPORTANCE OF THE DIFFUSION TO SECURE TO MODIFY THE BSL http://www.iadcro.com/diffusion.html
IADCR
http://www.iadcro.com http://www.iadcro.com/information.html
IADCRO &
FIAPBT,
always defending the discriminated breeds showing its positive face to educate
the ignorant society.
FIAPBT: http://www.FIAPBT.net IADCRO: http://www.IADCRO.com
Please Copy and Paste it, interesting thing against
BSL, Pass it on this information in defense of all breed
dogs that are discriminated by Law, to your email lists and message boards or
blogs among other places, in where the people can hear us. Acting in this way
gain all the discriminated breeds by the BSL, DDA, PPP, etc.
Thanks
for your help.
Rapporteurs of the First International Congress IADCRO. Left to right, Mr. Antonio Pozuelos,
Mr. Demetrio Madrid, Mr. Mariano Peinado, Mrs. Rosana
Alvarez.
IADCRO informs:
The First
International IADCRO Congress celebrated
in Madrid, Spain, has been everything a success, in where HAS BEEN DEMONSTRATED SCIENTIFICALLY THE NON EXISTENCE OF
DANGEROUS OR POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS BREEDS DOGS. The
attending public has been very satisfied with the action with the rapporteurs,
showing to them his endorsement and support in this right cause, which is the
cause of all animal lovers. In this Congress, we have shown to the Spanish
Government, our complete disagreement with the present Law of the Potentially
Dangerous Dogs (Law PPP or BSL), under the scientific point of view.
For the information of all you, enclosed the four communications of the
participants in the First International IADCRO Congress ,
Saturday 13 of June in the hall Plenary sessions of the Municipal Meeting of
the City council of
IADCRO
FIRST INTERNATIONAL IADCRO CONGRESS.
Magazine “The Dog World” and the magazine
“Species”
Communications in sequence of action:
….............. COMMUNICATION OF Mr. MARIANO
PEINADO.
Good afternoon. My name is Mariano Peinado and I have the honor to be the president of IADCRO. From that we compose
IADCRO, I give to all you, like our guests rapporteurs, the Welcome and
gratefulness to all to attend this First International IADCRO Congress, to
endorse us in this right cause, which, I imagine that also you are the cause of
all, showing our complete disagreement the Spanish Government with the Law of
the Potentially Dangerous Dogs, well-known popularly like Law PPP (BSL).
The Agenda of the Congress, will consist of dismantling step by step
this Law PPP scientifically for being a discriminatory, and unjustly
ineffective Law, proclaiming” the nonexistence of Potentially Dangerous
canine races”, as
we come realising for a long time, but this time of different way, since we
will also do in addition it of scientific way by mouth to the its own
protagonists.
By this same one in IADCRO, we vindicated the nonconvenience
of the cataloguing by Law of no canine race like Potentially Dangerous,
as at the moment unfortunately are eight noble canine races in Law PPP. Those
that we are within the canine world for or some years, (in me case since I have reason use
at the moment I have 44 years), say especially to my experience that the term of Potentially
Dangerous would be due to only attribute to the dogs of any race, size or mixed and like
individuals, that by its bad character and bad conduct make fear for the physical
integrity of the people,
specially with the children.
Also they come to endorse our vindication, our guests rapporteurs:
·
Mr. Antonio Pozuelos, President of
AEPE and unique
Doctorate in
·
Later, Mrs. Rosana Alvarez, Veterinaria and Clinical
Ethology. Assiduous rapporteur of the courses of Clinical Ethology of the
·
And Finally, Mr. Demetrio Madrid, First
President of Castilla y Leon. Ex- Senator and ex-
Deputy in several legislatures. He was the Creator of the
unique acceptable amendment like effective joust and before the IADCRO eyes,
before originating unfortunate Law PPP, being the unique amendment that was
realised at the time, that agrees with the ideas and the expositions
of IADCRO and that we asked for the present Government of Spain. Unfortunately,
this superb amendment did not have majority to be approved at its time.
The solution that offered the Spanish
Government at the time to solve the attacks of dogs to people, consisted of
elaborating quickly and running the Law PPP, to silence the social alarm who
had been generated, although it had to criminalize to eight noble canine races
and also it consisted of the acquisition of an Administrative License,
happening evidently through box.
To put an example of the absurd thing of this solution to say, that in
San Sebastián-Donostia, All the centers of psicotécnicas tests, THEY REFUSE to realise
the tests for the obtaining of License PPP, being alleged
reasons of moral, ethics and professionalism, by the ineffective thing of the
Law PPP….
in short, the words exceed….
The term of Potentially Dangerous, would be due to only attribute to the
dogs of any race, size or mixed and always like individuals, that
by its bad character and bad conduct make fear for the physical integrity of
the people, especially
by the children.
5 - In IADCRO we have the conviction that Uniting the Subject of the
Congress,”
the nonexistence of Potentially Dangerous canine
races”, with
the vindication of IADCRO and all you in this Congress, of “the nonconvenience of cataloguing by Law to no
canine race like Potentially Dangerous”, would
provide a good solution to this important social problem. By this same one
and from this Congress, WE FORMALLY ASKED FOR the Spanish
Government, not eliminating present Law PPP, if not rather MODIFYING IT, since
altering it not much, he could work very well. The modification of Law PPP
would consist of the following aspects:
a) At any moment to
foment in
Law PPP the Proprietor RESPONSIBLE of dog, they are of any race, mestization or charts, criminalizing to the irresponsible
proprietor and not to the eight noble and wonderful canine races.
b) The modification of Law PPP suppressing completely Annex
1, where they appear the name of the eight noble and wonderful
catalogued canine races like Potentially Dangerous; The American
Pit Bull Terrier, Staffordshire BulI Terrier,
American Staffodshire Terrier, Rottweiler, Argentine
Bulldog, Brazilian Fila, Tosa Inu
and Akita Inu.
Also suppressing the point
first of Annex 2, where the physical characteristics of the supposedly
Potentially Dangerous dog are described.
c) We solicit that in the Law PPP, I
mistreat animal of first degree is contemplated like crime.
REAL DECREE OF 22 OF MARCH OF 2002 (Law PPP). http://www.fiapbt.net/decreto.html
LAW PPP MODIFIED BY IADCRO ACCORDING TO EFFECTIVE JOUST AND - http://www.iadcro.com/leycorrecta.html
In IADCRO we pleaded for the responsible possession and once modified
present Law PPP, one would be due to even contemplate like crime and with pain of jail, to those irresponsible proprietors who their dogs,
are of the race which they are, mixed or of any stature, they have been the
very serious causes of the death of a person or wounds.
As much in the canine species as in the human species, the aggressive
conduct is determined of a very similar way, of this would more ahead speak the
ethologys scientists to us who accompany to us. What
it never determines the aggressiveness in the human species and in the canine
species, is the race to which belongs the individual. For example in the human
species, the black race does not have so that to be more aggressive than the
white race or the yellow race, and in the canine species, the canine race
American Pit Bull Terrier, Rottweiler, Argentine Bulldog or anyone of the rest
of the races badly catalogued in Law PPP like Potentially Dangerous, do not
have so that to be more aggressive than the Collie race, that Labrador
Retriever or the Cocker race.
The factor of the aggressiveness, is in the dog like individual and not
in the race. The aggressiveness generates the lived
and learned lessons and negative experiences in its surroundings from puppy,
the bad education and the same defects or complexes that his proprietor to the transmitírselos suffers direct or indirectly.
The aggressiveness is not generated by the race
of the animal, that is to say, or all the races are Potentially
Dangerous or she is not it any, we in IADCRO we affirmed that no race is it. In view of which the human factor is fundamental so that the aggressive behavior of the dogs is generated or not, it becomes
necessary to modify Law PPP urgently, to begin this way to foment
the Possession Responsible for the Proprietor, independently the race that it
owns, happening to clear as rapidly as possible
of Law PPP, the names of the races badly catalogued like Potentially Dangerous, given his
nonexistence and as of that moment, the Law
would begin to be effective and right, making recover the lost dignity
to the dogs pertaining to the eight noble races along with its responsible
proprietors, who live under this negative cataloguing and unjust discrimination
for too many years.
To catalogue like Potentially Dangerous to an animal by its race or its
physical characteristics thus immediately, is something ridiculous that never was
maintained zootechnical, nor scientifically, since then by this same rule of three, also we
would have to define with this unjust one and negative cataloguing to all the
other races of dogs, even to the races of small dogs, so that they given their
physical characteristics, are more than enabled to kill to she drinks, since in
fact it has happened in innumerable occasions we can appreciate and it in the statistics of attacks
of dogs to people of several countries you drink, them are human also. Then What
we do? We catalogue by Law to all the existing races (600) like Potentially
Dangerous? I believe that you will be in agreement with us who this would be a
great barbarism, cataloguing so negatively and of that way to the best friend
of the man from the beginnings of the humanity.
Recently, another Investigation has been realised to verify that
there is of certain in the aggressiveness of certain races. This time Don
Joaquin has realised it the Spanish investigator Perez Stew, which not this
today between us by agenda problems, but has assured to us that it will not
lack for the next Congress of IADCRO, and to this it has realised it
investigation in the University of Cordova: The result of the investigation,
was what the etólogos scientists who accompany to us
in today, already knew for enough time, that the dogs
are aggressive if they receive a bad education, not by their race. http://www.iadcro.com/estudio.html
Within this investigation, races catalogued like potentially Dangerous
in Law aggressive PPP and considered are included like the American Pit Bull
Terrier or the Rottweiler erroneously. The conclusions surprise: The
investigation affirms, that the main guilty of the attacks by dominance or competition of
their mascots are the irresponsible proprietors.
According to investigating Don Joaquin Perez-Stew, main author of the
study of this investigation, some factors that cause aggressiveness in the dogs
are: the fact that the owners have not had a dog before, not to put under it a
basic training of obedience, to allow or to mimar to
the dog in excess, not to use the punishment of physical type when this one is
necessary, to acquire the dog with the intentions of simple
gift, mascot for defense or whim, to castrate the
females, to leave the food him of indefinite form, or to dedicate to him
generally and in its strolls just a short time.
“The
ignorance of all these factors, would harness east
type of aggressiveness to the individual and would conform what
colloquially we could call like giving a bad
education to our
dog”, explains Perez-Stew.
The team of investigators of Perez Stew, studied 711 dogs (354 males and
357 females) of which 594 were of pure race and 117 mestizos majors of a year.
Between the observed races they emphasize the Bull Terrier, the apparently more
docile American Pit Bull Terrier, Bóxer, Rottweiler,
Doberman, as well as races like the Dalmatian, the Irish Setter, the Golden
Delicious ones retriever, the Farmer to retriever, the Caniche
miniature, the Chihuahua, the Pekinés, or the French
Bulldog, that also show dominant and aggressive attitudes.
The conclusion to this
investigation, makes by itself fall the subject of the Congress of today,” the nonexistence of Potentially Dangerous canine
races”. And one becomes to show, the urgent necessity of the Modification of present Law PPP in Spain, since like we can verify in the investigations, the one
that a dog attacks a person, the unique person in charge and culprit is the
human, his irresponsible
proprietor, then it is necessary to legislate
to foment the
responsible proprietor and to criminalize to the irresponsible proprietor, not to eight noble
and wonderful canine races.
- IN IADCRO WE ASKED the GOVERNMENT the unjust, the
discriminatory one Modification of and ineffective Law PPP,
since it absolutely does not protect the Citizen, this has been demonstrated in
more than 7 years than it takes implanted like Law, from the 22 of March of the
2002 and he will never be able to solve this great problem that has the Spanish
society, rather quite the opposite, the situation gets worse every day that
happens.
The primary target of IADCRO, is the descatalogación like Potentially Dangerous races to the eight noble
races contemplated like so in unfortunate Law PPP.
The majority of the dogs that yes that is
really Potentially Dangerous and that are it like individuals of all
the races and mestizos, so that its bad character with the people has
determined therefore it, are not forced by Law PPP to have an
insurance not to belong to one of the eight races including in Law PPP, and so
after attacking a person, in many cases the irresponsible owner of that animal
is declared insolvent, not to cover with the expenses that an irresponsibility
derives from such characteristics.
Just as the dead hundreds of or produced severely woundeds
in traffic accidents in freeways, when trying to avoid to run over dogs, many
of them of small size and that they also bring about deaths of people, being
its free irresponsible proprietors and without
punishment. All these people who have been victims of a way or another one, are
abandoned and without aid because of this dangerous,
discriminatory and ineffective Real Decree of 2002 or Law PPP, are a shame of Law and
also it would be a shame that Politicians directed to us allowed who it.
By this and other similar details, are what causes that present Law PPP
not only does not protect the citizen, if who in addition causes that Law PPP
is dangerous for the citizens, so that in very many cases the victims are
abandoned by this Law PPP, leaving it do not go to the majority of the dogs
that really are Potentially Dangerous. Or
all the races are Potentially Dangerous or she is not it any, IADCRO and all
the guests rapporteurs of the Congress, affirm that no race is Dangerous or
Potentially Dangerous. The right and outside effective Law so that, would
have the same to be for all the dogs, without race discriminations and as of
that moment, doubtless the Law will offer MAJOR
SECURITY TO the CITIZEN and MAJOR
SECURITY TO the DOGS Generally, being a right, effective
law and for all the same. These are the foundations for any successful Law.
- One has always said that to rectify it is of
wise people. This it is the case of several Countries, some of
them quite near
From IADCRO, we have advised to the Ministries Agriculture of several
countries that they had implanted Laws similar to the Spanish, like for example
The conclusion to these
rectifications, makes by itself fall the subject of the Congress of today,” the nonexistence of Potentially Dangerous canine
races”, becoming to show, the urgent necessity of the Modification of present Law PPP in Spain.
Another one of the data to which we talked about to
affirm” the nonexistence of Potentially Dangerous canine races”, we found in
the statistics of
the accidents caused by attack of dog the human. In the first positions of the
races that attack the people more, are those races
that are not including in the list of Law PPP.
If Potentially Dangerous races really existed, It would not be logical
that these lists agreed in all the countries contemplate that them?
There is no unamimity at
world-wide level about the races catalogued like potentially dangerous, existing
great differences between countries, or to omit national races, discrimination
towards foreign ancestries for political reasons, or particular experiences of
each region against attacks and mordeduras of diverse
types of dogs. All this comes to mean, that the creation of lists of races
cataloguing them like Potentially Dangerous, does not have any value nor Zootechnical rigor sustains that it.
The races that are catalogued like the “Potentially Dangerous ones” in
Law PPP, peculiarly are of best for the rescue
and the rescue of
people and for Therapies with physical and psychic handicappeds
with exceptional results. The eight canine races badly catalogued by the
Spanish Government like Potentially Dangerous, this more than demonstrated than
really are very beneficial for the Spanish society.
4 - WHEN I AM CREATED LAW PPP, ONE DID NOT CONSIDER To the
professionals of the canine union (Veterinary
Associations (like AMVAC of Madrid and ACUAC of Catalonia), Institutions and
International Associations related to the dogs, to investigators like Joaquin
Perez Stew, the Naturalist Luis Miguel Domínguez Mencía, et cetera. But to who really done of less for the accomplishment
of this Law PPP, it went more to the indicated professionals of the canine
world for this task, the Etólogos Scientists.
In the case of the ETOLOGOS, the Government has not considered
to them, being the suitable professionals of the canine subject more for the
advising at the time of creating a right and effective Law in the dogs and
their proprietors, in addition they are scientists in this question. The
Spanish association of etólogos AEPE and to their president Don
Antonio Pozuelos, ONLY Doctorate in
The ethologys contribute
their demonstrable reasonings scientifically and
affirm of the nonexistence of Potentially
Dangerous races and the nonconvenience for the
society and the dogs generally, creating Lists of races with this type of
negative cataloguings without no strictly speaking zootechnical type sustains that it.
If one had considered to previously mentioned, before creating present Law PPP, the Subject of the Congress of today
would have fallen by itself,” the nonexistence of Potentially Dangerous canine races”, and
we would not have arrived at the necessity
of these moments so urgent, the one of the Modification of present Law PPP in
Spain.
- We would have to consider that:
* Strength or size of a dog is not synonymous of
aggressiveness. Always there is great saying, that the more and the
more hard is the dog, the more noble it is.
* We would not have to forget to us, that the dogs have been always
from the beginnings of the humanity, the best
friend of the man, facilitating to him company, security and to the
power to eat for their survival. It would be an enormous cruelty, to give the
back at the moment changing to them the cataloguing them of the best friend of
the man by the one of Potentially Dangerous.
The negative cataloguing of “Potentially Dangerous” races or similars denominations, is not the adapted thing, since that cataloguing is the worse sentence alive and defenseless
beings who are, being able to arrive at the
extermination and the ruin for anyone from the canine races that are catalogued
or considered of that way.
- the Pope Juan Pablo II said that “the animals also own soul and the human beings we must love them and being
shared in common with our smaller brothers”.
Those that Govern and the legislators to us, would have to take note
from these wise words of the Pope Juan Pablo II and to apply it with the dogs,
especially with the dogs pertaining to the eight races the condemned to undergo
all type of maltratos, that could take to their
extinction by such cataloguings.
Until the Modification does not become effective of Law PPP, the animalitos pertaining to the eight races along with their
responsible proprietors, will not have peace nor rest.
I am going to give to passage to our guests Rapporteurs, to which IADCRO
is thankful for very many the effort that they have
had to realise to attend the Congress, coming to
Two of the rapporteurs are, a Canine Etólogo
and to a Clinical Etóloga and would want to inform to
them that the professionals who dedicate themselves to the science of the customs, ethology, are
professional scientists who study the science of the behavior
of the animal in their natural means, in this case, the one of the canine races
and the mestizos among them. From the
scientific point of view they would speak, us to near the unfortunate one and
effective Real Decree of the Potentially Dangerous dogs and from this same
scientific point of view, they would speak also us of
the nonconvenience of cataloguing like Potentially
Dangerous to the eight races that at the moment are
contemplated with such definition in Law PPP.
And the last rapporteur is Don Demetrio Madrid, that was the creator
of the unique acceptable amendment like effective joust and before the
IADCRO eyes, before originating unfortunate Law PPP, being the unique amendment
that was realised at the time that it agrees with the expositions and
requests from IADCRO to the present Government of Spain.
The following rapporteur is:
Mr. Antonio Pozuelos
Jiménez De Cisneros.
President of the Association For the Study of
the Dog and its Surroundings AEPE.
Unique Doctorate in
Mr. Antonio has the word ...........
COMMUNICATION OF Mr. ANTONIO POZUELOS.
1. - Artificial selection
of Canis familiaris
to the benefit of the human factors of survival.
The Man, for 16,000 years,
domestic servant to the dog and has been beginning to select the races, based
on his characteristics and of the function that will occupy in the workings
that optimize their own factors of survival.
At
present, that diversification and specialization it seems to become blurred
although the races would be created like “specialists”. Thus, hypermetric
Nordic dogs, Terriers or act company as when its original function was very
different. However, the individuals of “all the races” properly manipulated in
their period of socialization, can act this as.
A law right, and
based on behavioural selective principles, would have to divide of the advising
of the owner with a view to the acquisition of the individual and the suitable
race for its needs.
2. - The instinct and
the learned conducts.
The conduct of the Dog,
like the one of any altricial species, obeys to a complex
interaction between innate and the learned thing.
A conduct will be innate
when the individual executes that it has been isolated from the birth and is
able to realise it we placed even though it in a different context.
The dog, like any animal, maintains
two instincts in its birth: survival and reproduction. All those directed
conducts to satisfy any factor with one of the instincts we catalogued, them
like: complex conducts. Those conducts must be learned in altriciales
species. Thus, the hunting conduct must be taught by the ancestors or, in the
case of the dog and of presenting/displaying imprinting heterospecífico,
by the human and the ancestors.
All the animal, including the
humans, we presented/displayed instinctive aggressiveness as selective factor
of adaptation although the pathological aggressiveness can appear in any
individual of any species or race.
One of the aims of the
law must be the detection of the individuals of any race that can
present/display this type of aggressiveness. The breeder must be the guarantor
of this task and for it must be a professional properly trained.
3. - Heredabilidad
of the conduct and supposed genetic transmission of the racial aggressiveness.
The present studies aim at
that the heredabilidad of the conduct is not
significantly different from zero. There is a character that if it is
transmitted in a greater percentage: the fear. This character can be
responsible for anomalous conducts like: hyperactivity, nervousness, discharge emocionalidad, deciphered evil of signals or aggressiveness
of the defensive type.
On the other hand, the Dog
like dissolute species, receives all the parental cares of the mother and/or
the human. If the mother presents/displays learned aggressiveness, the puppies
also can with an ample probability, being dangerous, not by genetics but by
learning, that is to say, the nonadaptive
aggressiveness is not inherited but it can be learned.
The races enjoy concrete
characteristics for which they were selected. Thus, there are selected dogs of
great mandibular force for takes hold of head of cattle, endurance for
pasturing or agility and sense of smell for hunting. All can be aggressive by
learning or by deficiency but all “they only bring” in his genetic message that
one part of the necessary aggressiveness for the survival.
The law must prevent
that individual without scruples they raise and they manipulate animal with
aggression aims intra or specific Inter. He is not proven that exists
unscrupulous citizen aggressive races but.
4. - Scientific Advising of
the legislators for the development of the Law.
In order to undertake the
task of legislating, in matter that affects million citizen owners of mascots,
the advisory rapporteur must look for properly enters the professionals trained
and whose academic file is the indicated one and specific for the subject that
occupies and worries to the public opinion.
In the elaboration of
this law the veterinary advising, etológico and
genetic has been excluded indeed that is left into the hands of criadores, clubs, trainers or professionals of other fields
nonrelated to the biosanidad nor to the Behavior animal.
CONCLUSIONS
·
Races more aggressive do not exist than “genetically nonapt”
individual others but in anyone of them.
· The
pathological aggressiveness is learned of the ancestors or the humans.
· The
Administration is responsible for which the citizen has access to a serious
information at the time of choosing an animal of any race.
· The
Law must demand responsibility to the breeder, manipulator and trainer of any
animal that can cause damage. For it, and in its development, it will have to
take the necessary measures so that these form in regulated centers
establishing, of that form, a recognized profession.
· A
law does not have to go against any species nor race but of the manipulations
that they are put under by unscrupulous citizens.
ANTONIO POZUELOS JIMÉNEZ OF CISNEROS. Doctoral program in Physical Anthropology. Graduated in University
Advanced Studies of 3º Cycle (line of investigation; behavior
animal and human). Adviser and therapist in behavior
animal (own title of the
The Following rapporteur is:
Mrs. Rosana
Alvarez. Lawyer
in Veterinary medicine and scientist in Clinical Ethology. Assiduous
rapporteur of the courses of Clinical Ethology of the
Do6na Rosana has the word
...........
COMMUNICATION of Mrs. ROSANA ALVAREZ.
THE ABSURD THING OF THE
LAW OF POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DOGS
Before
entering detailing the title of this exhibition, I want to pause a little while
in making them contributor of an investigation recently realised in the
University of Cordova, of the whose news echo became the Magazine of the School
of Veterinarians of Malaga:
The
aggressive attitude of the dogs depends on the education that receive on the
part of their owners and not as much of the race to whom they belong, according
to it reveals a study made by the University of Cordova and published by the
Information service and the Scientific News.
“Many dogs are
sacrificed or left by their violent attitude, but contrary to which it thinks,
in the aggressive conduct of the dog the race has little protagonism
with respect to all the factors that depend on the owner”
The
investigation equipment aimed that the external factors, modifiable and
dependent of the owner are those that influence more in the attitude of the
animal. According to the main author of the study, Joaquin Perez Stew, the fact
that the owners have not had a dog before, not to put under it a basic training
of obedience, to allow to the dog in excess, not to use the punishment of
physical type when it is necessary, to castrate the females, to leave the food
him of indefinite form or to dedicate to him just a short time, conditions the
attitude of the animal.
On the
other hand, he assures that there are certain dependent elements of the dog
that are associate to a greater aggressiveness by dominance, like for example
determined races, masculine sex, the small size or the age of five to seven
years. Nevertheless, these factors represent “a minimum weight” in the violent behavior of the dog.
After analyzing
the results of the study, Perez Stew considers that “it is not normal that the
dogs that receive the suitable education maintain dominance behaviors
aggressive” and indicates that in case this happens would have to some medical
or organic problem “that can bring about changes of conduct in the dog”.
The
study, that has recently published in the Journal of Animal and Veterinary
Advances, part of the data of which near the 40 percent of the aggressions by
dominance of the dogs they are tie to “little authoritarian owners” who never
have realised basic training of obedience with their mascots or that, they have
done if it, has been of minimum form.
In the
study 711 dogs participated (354 males and 357 females), of which 594 were of
pure race and 117 mestizos majors of a year, between the races were
Bullterrier, American Pitbullterrier, German
Shepherd, Boxer, Rottweiler, Dobermann, Dalmatian, Irish, Golden Delicious
Setter retriever, Farm to retriever, Caniche
miniature, Chihuahua, Pekinés or French Bulldog.
With this
I have not done more than to ratify what one has before said by my companions
rapporteurs.
According
to the norm, with the entrance in force of Decree 42/2008 of 12 of February, by
that the Potentially Dangerous Animal possession is regulated in the
Independent Community of Andalusia, the necessity is created to establish
criteria for the appointment of VVPPP and the planning and organization of
credited specific courses in the matter, that enable and form to the
veterinarians in the necessary aspects for the suitable valuation of the
Potential Danger of Dogs.
Then, I am
called Rosana Alvarez and I am Veterinary Valorador of the Potential Danger of Perros
(VVPPP). This title cost 150€ that I paid to me, like many other companions,
for 8 hours intensive in a course that turned out to be a farce and a model of
nonsense for all the assistants. With a day of formation, about which half was
developed listening to speak of legislation, and only the other half dealed with the subject of the aggressiveness, tried that
the veterinarians we formed like “enabled to value the aggressiveness of a
dog”, when the aggressiveness is matter of a University Masters or a course of
800 hours like which we distributed.
And that
is not the worse thing of the subject, that one was not serious, did not seem a
formation course, seemed “the corral of the marijuana user”. The worse thing of
this norm, is that those that we not even understand of this we will be able to
diagnose when we go to value the case of a dangerous dog. We will not be able
to say if the problem comes from here or from or has this there or that one
solution, soon to treat it. The unique thing that is required to us is that we
certify if a dog IS or HE IS NOT potentially dangerous. What want that it says
gentlemen to them! For that I prefer that they do not call to me, although this
way could amortize the money that cost the certificate to me. He could not
carry out the profession that as much I like and as much work has cost to
remove to me ahead, the one of specialistic
Veterinarian in conduct problems. Although if I do not go, they clear the
certificate to me, what seems to them?
Most
graceful it is than in the documentation of the course, there is a chapter that
is called PREVENTION OF MORDEDURAS, WHAT TO DO BEFORE a POSSIBLE AGGRESSION,
BASIC RULES OF SURVIVAL. That is to say, before an aggression, we must decide
to us things like: not to watch at the dog the eyes, not to put to us
squatting, if we are running or in bicycle to stop to us, not to move the arms,
if we fall to protect the vital organs to us, not to scream. I believe that for
anyone of the presents, the basic norm of survival is “feet why I want to you”.
How they
try that the veterinarians we in the middle understand day what wants to communicate
a dog? But that is the result of years of observation and study! I say to them
that in char the one that I gave veterinarians recently, practically nobody was
able to interpret the positions of an aggressive dog, and much less the causes
of the aggressiveness. By all means this is fault of a lack of formation and
the little capacity to identify behavior problems and
to derive them to a specialist. In spite of this, if “it is called on to them”
to some of them to be the valorador in a case, since
it works by list order, must do it, cannot derive it to a specialist who
dedicates itself to it.
Noncontentments with
that, the City council, that is the first filter for the case denounced or
communicated by the Service Andalusian of Health before a part of aggression,
can appoint like valorador an official Veterinarian,
who not even has received the famous course. In addition, the last one in
deciding with our report in the hand, if the dog is dangerous IF is the City
council or no.
The
sadness of all the subject is that nobody knows who has elaborated all these
norms nor to whom have requested him advising. To that we are here, of course
they have not called to us. Nor we do not know either if they will have us to
distribute the formation courses, that according to the Decree will have to
follow the proprietors of dogs of considered races potentially dangerous.
The
protocol of action to value a case will vary in the different provinces
Andalusian, according to consider the organisms local in joint action. In the
A dog is
object of denunciation or from aggressions. The report passes to the City
council and this one to the School. The School designates to a veterinarian by list
order, beginning by the letter designated in drawing. The veterinarian puts
itself in contact with the proprietor to realise the pertinent report. The propietary one pays to the services to the School and this
one to the valorador veterinarian. It informs happens
to the City council that is the one that finally decides.
It informs
into the valorador veterinarian consists of:
·
Questionnaire of socialization for valuation of the
potential danger of dogs.
·
Veterinary report of valuation of the potential danger
of dogs.
·
Veterinary report of valuation of the biological agent
PPP (those that already was catalogued like PPP).
Finally I
would like to emphasize the problem of the proceeding to obtain the proprietor
license of potentially dangerous dog, that surely will have undergone many of
the assistants. To only say to him, and with they will understand it to this,
that the veterinarians we preferred to identify in the registry of microchip to
a dog like mestizo, not to have to happen through necessary the administrative
proceedings, for which the competent organs are not agreed, and so the client
does not do more than to give returns of a side for another one, to only
continue having their dog. Although unfortunately some dogs undergo another
cruel destiny.
You will
say what has to do in all this Ethology. This is mainly what we wished to
change. Because the professionals who we dedicated ourselves to her we are
scientists. And here science by any side does not glimpse. Everything is a pure
administrative proceeding that has neither feet nor head.
Thank you
very much.
ROSANA ALVAREZ. Lawyer in Veterinary medicine by the
As last rapporteur of the Congress we have a:
3º Mr.
Demetrio Madrid. He was the First
President of the Independent Community of Castilla y
Leon. Ex-
Senator and ex- Deputy.
He belongs to AEORMA (Defense of the Nature)
He has written some books and coauthor of
others. Also he has written numerous articles for mass media.
He has realised numerous amendments of diverse subjects.
Mr. Demetrio has received several distinctions and decorations, among
them we emphasized:
• Gold medal
of the Independent Community of Madrid
• Order of the
Constitutional Merit
• Gold medal
of the Senate of the
• Gold medal
of Cortes of Castilla y Leon.
Etc. etc.
But what it more draws attention in IADCRO of Mr. Demetrio, it is that
one Amendment that
realised Being delegated and that I give myself like alternative to present and
unfortunate Law PPP. The amendment of Mr. Demetrio, was the unique correct and
effective alternative of that the problem of the attacks of dogs to people and
the content of their amendment were given at that time before, agrees and so
IADCRO asks for the present Government, the nonconvenience
of cataloguing canine races of no negative way within the Law, starting off of
the foundation of the nonexistence of Dangerous or Potentially Dangerous canine races.
Mr. Demetrio has the word ...........
COMMUNICATION OF Mr. DEMETRIO MADRID.
AMENDMENT OF Mr. DEMETRIO MADRID
Extracted text of the congress of the deputies of the
The gentleman VICE-PRESIDENT (Fernandez-Vantage point
and Lozana): Thank you very much, Mr. Neat Lopez.
For the presentation of the amendment to the totality of return of
the Socialist Parliamentary Group, Mr.
Mr. MADRID LOPEZ: The nonexistence of a legislation global and updated
on the dog like animal of company and its social integration, as or figure in
the legislation of the countries socially advanced, makes the approval of a
suitable law that necessary it guarantees so much the security of the people
and the responsibility of the possesors or owners of
the dogs like the right to enjoy the company of this animal.
Sir president, delegated ladies and delegated
gentlemen, Sir minister Posada, against the old theory of the dog like dangerous
animal Rep, of the intrinsically harmful dog, the more innovating current of
thought indeed sees in the dog an instrumental element that in agreement with
the appropriate agreement can and must be used in great variety of activities.
By its own characteristics, the dog belongs to a social species of instinct
predator. Some of these activities into the hands of individuals with
antisocial tendencies can be the development of the basic aggressiveness of the
canine ones to create disturbances.
I want to raise this intervention in very positive terms of the use and
the social relation of the dog with the citizens. The purpose therefore of a
law on the potentially dangerous animal possession cannot be reduced to
penalize the existence of dogs that present/display certain characteristics
Page 14226
racial or of the set of whatever they register within one it makes
specific racial typology, not to penalize merely by its physical aspect,
charts, weight, et cetera, but to look for the control and the limitation of
those exhibitions of aggressiveness or antisocial violence in which they are
used on the part of its proprietors, true people in charge of that aggressive
conduct. The dog that shows aggressiveness towards learned the human being acts
following you rule of conduct, reason why it is possible to consider that the
violent subject is the owner and the dog is a mere object through which such
violence is pronounced. Therefore, the dog will be dangerous following how it
is educated to him and of it uses whom it.
On the other hand, it is necessary to psychically recognize the animal
existence defective as a result of an inadequate raising in unsuitable
ecological conditions for the species or with excess of consanguinity, hardly
recoverable dogs and in which sterilization is advised. This reality
contributes to the necessity to affect the control of genealogical books the
raising of dogs of race like a guarantee of security for the citizens.
The existence of races cannot either refuse that genetically own a more
irascible temperament, irritability than it can be exacerbated by diverse
instincts, sexual, territorial, hierarchic, et cetera; but so that these
units of the canine species become dangerous is not enough with the genetic
message, they need an appropriate environment and a experience, factors both
that only can provide the proprietor to him.
The totality of the canine races that the mass media have come
indicating as attacking have near a century of existence; therefore the
exposition would not be valid that within the canine species it has arisen in
just a short time an uncontrollable eagerness to bite the citizens. Taken in
consideration the fact that numerous anthropologists, sociologists and
educators have detected in sectors of the modern society a flood and in some
cases alarming irresponsibility degree, it is perhaps this factor the one that
also can have notable lately incidence in the increase of aggressions carried
out by the dogs. Therefore, the triggering factor of such aggressions is
multi-factor: irresponsibility of the proprietor, inadequate education or
training harnessing the ecological aggressiveness, unsuitable conditions, and
finally genetic message.
The law project that presents/displays the Government to us, Sir minister, does
not confront the problems, rather it gives the impression to elude them or to try
to solve empty precipitadamente legislative and deep
vices of the Administration without entering at heart of the problems. The law project does not respond to general
missions on
which the competential regime is based and that
justifies the state intervention of arrangement on the matter, and
nevertheless it decides on an administrative regime of management that affects
the own scope of the autonomic and local competitions. The initiative,
when extending its scope of application to the possession of any type of wild
fauna in captivity and talking about to an indetermine
potentially dangerous animal concept and whose concretion is relegated to the
prescribed scope, brings about a confusion of concepts as far as the canine
species. It does not respond the project of law to the problems
basic, regarding the census and control of genealogy and zootechnics
of the dogs, nor
establishes guarantees on the veracity of certificates of origin and pedigrí, that is the bottom and the origin of any
legislative and prescribed development there, by means of the opportune control
of the intervention and inspection that must exert the Administration on these
genealogical books.
This project of law, gentleman minister, does not
approach the fulfillment of the
European directives
nor modifies the exclusive use and excluding of canine genealogical
books in Spain, that as you very or know exists a private monopoly, that is to
say the privatization of which it must be public. This aspect is fundamental
and basic to confront any arrangement in the sector.
Finally, the law project does not contemplate
the specific prohibition of the training of dogs for fights. The
fights are prohibited, therefore this law does not have more to prohibit them;
but it does not have nowhere, nor either in his project of law, anything that
specifies the training of dogs for fights nor the requirements regarding
the exercise of the profession of canine trainer or the corresponding ones to
the regime of recognition, determination of rights and obligations,
recognition, participation and control of the associations recognized for the
raising of dogs in our country.
Regarding the above, the Socialist Parliamentary Group sees itself in the necessity
to present/display this amendment to the totality of return,
when considering that the law project will not serve in its basic structure,
because does not reach the objectives that are required in the scope of
legislation in a country socially advanced like ours.
Sir minister, with the personal respect that I have to him, I advise
attention to him to the recent received inheritance, in the reorientation in
subjects like which today we tried, but also in the linen, milk, the fishing
grounds, relation with the independent communities, the European Union and
others. The Ministry with the smaller possible ballast organizes, and I say it
with greater loyalty; personal loyalty and loyalty also of which it guesses
right in the functions that it has entrusted.
Delegated ladies and delegated gentlemen, for all these reasons and
other many that are evident we cannot to explain, I ask for its vote
responsible in favor of the return for this project
of law for being from its origin, and I feel Sir minister
Page 14227
although you do not
have all the responsibility, manifestly improvable.
Thank you
very much. (Applause.)
The
gentleman VICE-PRESIDENT (Fernandez-Vantage point and Lozana):
Thank you very much, Mr. Madrid
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. Demetrio Madrid. First President of the Independent Community of
He has written some books and coauthor of
others. Also he has written numerous articles for mass media
It has received several distinctions and decorations, among them we
emphasized:
• Gold medal of
the Independent Community of Madrid
• Order of the
Constitutional Merit
• Gold medal of
the Senate of the
• Gold medal of
Cortes of Castile and Leon.
Etc. etc.
But what it draws attention of Mr. Demetrio more, it is that one Amendment
that realised Being delegated and that I give like present and unfortunate
alternative to the Real Decree Law of the PPP. The amendment of Mr. Demetrio,
was the unique correct alternative and effective before the problem of the
attacks of dogs to people and the content of his amendment, he is exactly what
IADCRO asks for the present Government, trying about the nonexistence of Dangerous
canine races and the nonconvenience of cataloguing
canine races of no negative way within the Law, since the
Law must be applied to all the canine species, is of the race that is, size or mestization, so that all the dogs into the hands of
IRRESPONSIBLE proprietors, are Potentially Dangerous and this is the reason reason why the Law must be directed to solely foment the
proprietors responsible for dog, without mattering race that they own. So
that the Law of the dogs is right and effective, it must be directed under
these parameters and that is applicable for all the same, not to of a way and
others of another one, like this happening at the moment for several years.
Today Mr. Demetrio would speak to us of its valuable amendment for
the Spanish society.
http://www.demetriomadrid.es/resources/CV+actualizado+01-03-2009.pdf
After the communication of Mr. Demetrio, passage occurred to that the
attending public set out their restlessness to be answered by the rapporteurs.
To say, that the attending public I enjoy enough and was very satisfied
with this First Congress the International of IADCRO, which began to the
VIDEO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Rf9NtQg7-M&feature=channel
INFORMATION UPDATE
THE
THE GREAT IMPORTANCE TO KEEP INTACT THE PEOPLE AND THE FAMILY VALUES AND
PRINCIPLES IN THE SOCIETY.
Statistics: http://www.fiapbt.net/statistics.htm
IADCRO
METHOD.THE
IMPORTANCE OF THE DIFFUSION TO SECURE TO MODIFY THE BSL http://www.iadcro.com/diffusion.html
SINCE IADCRO & FIAPBT WE WISH YOU THE BEST: Pit Bull Pictures http://www.iadcro.com/christmaspic.html
THE
REAL NATURE OF THE APBT PHOTOGRAPHED THROUGHOUT OF THE
HISTORY. IS
BETTER A IMAGE THAM THOUSAND WORDS. http://www.fiapbt.net/fotosbuenas.html
Vídeo: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxX1TY6hU_8
Has
been demonstrated scientifically in very much ways the nonexistence of Dangerous or
Potentially Dangerous breeds dogs. The SCIENTIFIC CONGRESS
message has VALIDED for all the
languages and all the countries, THE BSL IS NOT VALIDATED: http://www.iadcro.com/informationcongress.html
How can I help to defense the
discriminations breed dogs by the BSL? http://www.villaliberty.org/howcanido2.html
Breed Specific Legislation
(BSL) failing globally:
http://www.examiner.com/x-7742-Charlotte-Dog-Rescue-Examiner~y2009m6d30-Breed-specific-legislation-failing-globally
VIDEO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQ9Te3A17LQ
FRIEND WEB
SITES: http://www.iadcro.com/friendwebsites.html
THANK YOU TO
ALL
Mariano Peinado
IADCRO
& FIAPBT
IADCRO http://www.iadcro.com Please please please
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Breed specific legislation failing globally:
http://www.examiner.com/x-7742-Charlotte-Dog-Rescue-Examiner~y2009m6d30-Breed-specific-legislation-failing-globally
VIDEO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQ9Te3A17LQ
In
the FIRST IADCRO INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS about BSL, has been demonstrated scientifically the
nonexistence of Dangerous or Potentially Dangerous breeds dogs. http://www.iadcro.com/informationcongress.html
IADCRO, SUITABLY
INVITES, ANIMATES AND ORIENTS the LOVERS OF the ANIMAL, TO DEFEND PUBLICLY to
the races unjustly discriminated in Law PPP (BSL). http://www.iadcro.com/chuleta.html
MODIFICATION
OF BSL (LAW PPP) ALREADY http://www.iadcro.com/modificacionLeyPPPya.html
IADCRO ASKS FOR THE GOVERNMENT e http://www.iadcro.com/iadcrosolicita.html
T
THUS
MUST BE THE BSL (LAW PPP)
ONCE MODIFIED http://www.iadcro.com/leycorrecta.html
STATISTICS
OF COUNTRIES (Attacks) http://www.fiapbt.net/estadisticas.html
COUNTRIES WITH BSL THAT WE MUST MAKE BOYCOTT. http://www.iadcro.com/boicot.htm
How I can help and to be member of IADCRO? http://www.villaliberty.org/howcanido.html
LIES
AGAINST THE APBT AND OTHER BREEDS P
http://www.iadcro.com/mentiras.html
FIRST CONGRESS THE IADCRO
INTERNATIONAL http://www.iadcro.com/1congress.html
INVITATION http://www.iadcro.com/invitation.html
TESTIMONIES:
PROFESSIONALS ETOLOGOS SPEAK OF “THE
DANGEROUS” RACES.
http://www.fiapbt.net/mensajeetologos.html
POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DOGS VERSUS
REALLY DANGEROUS HUMANS
http://www.fiapbt.net/pppvicentes.html
POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DOGS: MYTH OR
REALITY?
http://www.fiapbt.net/vicentesalcedo.html
The dogs are
aggressive if they receive a bad education, not by their race.
http://www.iadcro.com/estudio.html
To near the
“aggressiveness” in some determined canine races. http://www.iadcro.com/agresividad.html
Science confirms
that the mascots feel emotions and have beneficial effects on their http://www.iadcro.com/ciencia.html owners
DANGEROUS RACES OR IRRESPONSIBLE
OWNERS? http://www.iadcro.com/eladiestradoroficial.html
SO THAT IT HAPPENS THE SOCIAL ALARM
AROUND THE RACES OF DOGS. http://www.fiapbt.net/alarma.html
FORCE IN JAWS OF CANIS FAMILIARIS
DEPARTMENT OF RESCUE AND RESCUE WITH
AMERICAN PIT BULL TERRIER (FIAPBT). http://www.fiapbt.net/rescate.html
Department
of IADCRO and the FIAPBT of Therapy Attended Physical and Psychic Handicappeds
with AMERICAN PIT BULL TERRIER http://www.iadcro.com/terapia.html
English
In the FIRST IADCRO INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS about BSL, has been demonstrated scientifically the nonexistence of
Dangerous or Potentially Dangerous
breeds dogs. The
SCIENTIFIC CONGRESS message has VALIDED
for all
the languages
and all the
countries. http://www.iadcro.com/informationcongress.html
How can I help to defense
the discriminations breed dogs by the BSL? http://www.villaliberty.org/howcanido2.html
IADCRO
METHOD. THE
IMPORTANCE OF THE DIFFUSION TO SECURE TO MODIFY THE BSL http://www.iadcro.com/diffusion.html
ALERTS http://www.iadcro.com/alert.html
COUNTRIES with BSL WE MUST DOING BOYCOTT http://www.iadcro.com/boicot.htm
NEWS
BOLETIN http://www.villaliberty.org/newsboletin.html
IADCRO http://www.iadcro.com http://www.iadcro.com/information.html
Statistics: http://www.fiapbt.net/statistics.htm - MEMBER
LIST OF IADCRO. http://www.villaliberty.org/iadcrolist.htm
Breed specific legislation failing
globally:
http://www.examiner.com/x-7742-Charlotte-Dog-Rescue-Examiner~y2009m6d30-Breed-specific-legislation-failing-globally
VIDEO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQ9Te3A17LQ
THE REAL NATURE OF THE APBT
PHOTOGRAPHED THROUGHOUT OF THE HISTORY. IS
BETTER A IMAGE THAM THOUSAND WORDS. http://www.fiapbt.net/fotosbuenas.html
– PRESENTACIÓN – del PRIMER CONGRESO INTERNACIONAL de IADCRO & FIAPBT. https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/photos/a.451449941132/10157475185806133/?type=3&theater
Estimad@s amig@s, ahora que se van a cumplir
los 10 años de la realización del PRIMER CONGRESO INTERNACIONAL de IADCRO &
FIAPBT, hemos publicado al completo este PRIMER CONGRESO que realizamos en Madrid el día 13 de junio de 2009, y ahora
lo mostramos paso a paso y vídeo por
vídeo de los tres ponentes invitados (2 sabios científicos y 1 político
honesto), e igualmente lo mostramos para todos aquellos a quienes les pudiera
interesar, para tener en cuenta la valiosa información que detallan y muestran
públicamente estos honrados y sabios Profesionales Ponentes al respecto de la
Temática que tratamos en dicho Congreso; “La NO EXISTENCIA de RAZAS CANINAS
PELIGROSAS y lo absurdo e INEFICAZ de la LEY PPP”.
– VIDEO de la PRESENTACIÓN del CONGRESO INTERNACIONAL DE IADCRO
& FIAPBT, Don Mariano Peinado (Presidente de la FIAPBT & IADCRO) en Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/videos/10156520580791133 y en YouTube: https://youtu.be/nZGSX0hqgMk
Post: https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/photos/p.10157457095996133/10157457095996133/?type=3&theater
También
adjuntamos la ENTREVISTA a IADCRO & FIAPBT de Radio 5 TODO NOTICIAS de
Radio Nacional de España: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2G8x69Yh1I8&feature=channe
En
el PRIMER CONGRESO INTERNACIONAL de IADCRO & FIAPBT, se ha DEMOSTRADO CIENTÍFICAMENTE la NO
EXISTENCIA de razas caninas PELIGROSAS ni POTENCIALMENTE PELIGROSAS.
En
el Congreso se habló en español y lo más importante, es que el mensaje de los
CIENTIFICOS ETOLOGOS allí reunidos CERTIFICANDO la NO EXISTENCIA de razas
caninas peligrosas, tiene VALIDED para todos los idiomas y para todos los países; http://www.iadcro.com/informacioncongreso.html
– VÍDEOS de los tres PONENTES –
PRIMER
PONENTE; El científico Don ANTONIO POZUELOS JIMÉNEZ DE CISNEROS. Programa
doctoral en Antropología Física. Diplomado en Estudios Avanzados Universitarios
de 3º Ciclo (línea de investigación; comportamiento animal y humano). Asesor y
terapeuta en comportamiento animal (título propio de la Universidad de
Granada). Estudió Etología en Dpto. de Biología animal y Ecología de la misma
universidad. Presidente de la Asociación Para el Estudio del Perro y su Entorno
(AEPE). Autor de los libros: En los Bancales del Sur, HUTA, La Etología del
Perro y coautor del Manual de Etología Canina. Clínica del Comportamiento.
Adiestramiento del Perro. Autor de más de 100 artículos sobre Etología canina.
Director y profesor principal del Curso de master en Etología Canina Avanzada.
( www.etologiacanina.net )
– VIDEO 1/3 del Primer PONENTE – Don ANTONIO POZUELOS – En Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/videos/334291757280852 Mismo VÍDEO en YouTube: https://youtu.be/HV7crwGrlcI Post: https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/photos/p.10157449427196133/10157449427196133/?type=3&theater
– VIDEO 2/3 del Primer PONENTE – Don ANTONIO POZUELOS – En Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/videos/633678150411833
Mismo
VÍDEO en YouTube: https://youtu.be/WOI2SkD8nrU Post: https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/photos/p.10157451359191133/10157451359191133/?type=3&theater
– VIDEO 3/3 del Primer PONENTE – Don ANTONIO POZUELOS – En Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/videos/2196595913987067 Mismo VÍDEO en YouTube: https://youtu.be/SVSMkOx-t04 Post: https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/photos/p.10157454109151133/10157454109151133/?type=3&theater
@ HOMENAJE a DON ANTONIO POZUELOS
JIMENEZ DE CISNEROS,
todo un Señor, Caballero y Maestro, falleció el día 29 de Septiembre de 2010, DESCANSE
EN PAZ. Nuestras condolencias y sentimientos para su adorable mujer y
familiares. http://www.iadcro.com/AntonioRIP.html
SEGUNDO
PONENTE; La científico Dª ROSANA ÁLVAREZ BUENO. Licenciada en Veterinaria por
la Universidad de Córdoba. Licenciada en Tecnología de los alimentos por la
misma universidad. Ejercicio activo de clínica de pequeños animales. Curso de
master en Etología Canina Avanzada y diversos cursos sobre comportamiento
animal. Profesora titular del Área de Veterinaria y auxiliar de la de Etología
aplicada de la Asociación para el Estudio del Perro y su Entorno (AEPE).
Trabajando como Veterinaria especialista en Etología clínica y asesora en
comportamiento canino y felino. Coautora del Manual de Etología Canina. Clínica
del Comportamiento. Adiestramiento del Perro. Ponente y colaboradora en
diversos cursos y charlas sobre Etología y Etología clínica a diversos niveles.
Autora de varios artículos sobre terapias comportamentales. Profesora del curso
de master en Etología Canina Avanzada. ( www.etologiaveterinaria.net )
– VIDEO 1/3 del Segundo PONENTE – Dª ROSANA
ALVAREZ – En Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/videos/673752969719785 Mismo VÍDEO en YouTube: https://youtu.be/njzxn9b6AHw Post: https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/photos/p.10157456613571133/10157456613571133/?type=3&theater
– VIDEO 2/3 del Segundo PONENTE – Dª ROSANA
ALVAREZ – En Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/videos/503193920216550 Mismo VÍDEO en YouTube: https://youtu.be/FWtZwzLHfXo Post: https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/photos/p.10157459008781133/10157459008781133/?type=3&theater
– VIDEO 3/3 del Segundo PONENTE – Dª ROSANA
ALVAREZ
– En Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/videos/2203805339858707 Mismo VÍDEO en YouTube: https://youtu.be/Pxm3t-ZL09k Post: https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/photos/p.10157465933506133/10157465933506133/?type=3&theater
TERCER
PONENTE; El político Don DEMETRIO MADRID. Primer Presidente de la Comunidad
Autónoma de Castilla y León. Ex Senador y ex Diputado. Pertenece a AEORMA
(Defensa de la Naturaleza)
Ha
escrito algunos libros y coautor de otros. También ha escrito numerosos
artículos para medios de comunicación
Ha
recibido varias distinciones y condecoraciones, entre ellas destacamos:
•
Medalla de oro de la Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid
•
Orden del Mérito Constitucional
•
Medalla de oro del Senado del Reino de España
•
Medalla de Oro de las Cortes de Castilla y León.
Etc.
etc.
* Enmienda del PSOE a través de Demetrio Madrid en 1999
contra la actual Ley PPP: http://www.iadcro.com/enmiendapsoe.html
Viene bien
recordar, que el actual Gobierno Socialista cuando se encontraba en la
oposición, puso el grito en el cielo cuando fue aprobada la actual Ley PPP por
el Gobierno del Partido Popular, ya que
la consideraba una LEY DISCRIMINATORIA, INEFICAZ e INJUSTA por nombrar razas
como Potencialmente Peligrosas. Entonces, estando ahora ya en el Gobierno,
¿Por qué no ELIMINAN o modifican adecuadamente
la Ley PPP?
– VIDEO 1/3 del Tercer PONENTE – Don DEMETRIO MADRID – En Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/videos/585121412001575 Mismo VÍDEO en YouTube: https://youtu.be/NzhCS4rFE8w Post: https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/photos/p.10157466054801133/10157466054801133/?type=3&theater
– VIDEO 2/3 del Tercer PONENTE – Don DEMETRIO MADRID – En Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/videos/1132505060284948 Mismo VÍDEO en YouTube: https://youtu.be/lOf4XNdyAQU Post: https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/photos/p.10157469494796133/10157469494796133/?type=3&theater
– VIDEO 3/3 del Tercer PONENTE – Don DEMETRIO MADRID – En Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/videos/273017916813920 Mismo VÍDEO en YouTube: https://youtu.be/f1ISSdtA2ZA Post: https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/photos/p.10157472387176133/10157472387176133/?type=3&theater
-----------------
Si
estás de acuerdo, ¡¡¡DIFUNDE!!! Hazlo por ellos (Los animalitos Injustamente Discriminados)
Hazlo por Tod@s, pero especialmente hazlo por ti
mismo. ¡¡¡Gracias!!!
- ¿Qué
puedo hacer para ayudar a paliar esta INJUSTICIA? http://www.iadcro.com/iadcroinformation.html -
http://www.fiapbt.net/manualdefensa.html
-- Ley PPP en
España desde 1999, fue COPIADA y
puesta en marcha en numerosos países por los 4 políticos Corruptos y vagos de
turno en el poder, para hacer igualmente sus respectivos negocios a costa de
los animalitos. ¡¡¡Una Injusta y Cruel PERSECUCIÓN!!! –
La enorme CRUEL INJUSTICIA que genera la Ley PPP fomenta no solo el MALTRATO
ANIMAL, también fomenta el MALTRATO HUMANO y el odio entre ciudadanos de bien.
Esta situación no puede continuar por mucho tiempo, debe cambiar y con el
esfuerzo de TOD@S, ¡¡¡Va a cambiar!!! https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/photos/a.451449941132.245086.271421886132/10156518193096133/?type=3&theater
“La
IGNORANCIA o falta de CONOCIMIENTO, La normalización de lo INCORRECTO, la MALA
INTENCIÓN y la falta de PERSONALIDAD, CRITERIO y de SENTIDO COMÚN en la RAZA
HUMANA (bajas vibraciones en resumen), es lo más peligroso para esta sociedad
global en la que nos encontramos en la actualidad.” (m.p.)
Mariano
Peinado
FIAPBT & IADCRO
https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT - http://www.fiapbt.net
PD. Adjuntamos
algo de información al respecto, especialmente para aquellos a los que les
pudiera interesar la razón verdadera del porque alguien en un momento
determinado le interesó catalogar a una serie de razas como Peligrosas,
comprendiendo esta razón se llega al AUTOMATICO ENTENDIMIENTO de que
efectivamente NO EXISTEN RAZAS CANINAS PELIGROSAS, más claro agua…
--
ORIGEN DE LA LEY PPP en 1999 -- ¿Quién fue el responsable de crear la
lista de razas caninas "Peligrosas" o PPP y porque razón lo hizo el muy canalla? https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/photos/a.451449941132/10157373679481133/?type=3&theater ´
Esta es
una pregunta que nadie se ha formulado y los medios de comunicación han querido
pasar desapercibida. Adentrándonos en el fondo de esta pregunta podremos
entender que no existen razas caninas peligrosas y también podremos comprender
que motivó a la persona responsable de la creación de esta dichosa lista negra,
para caer tan bajo para crearla. https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/photos/a.451449941132/10157044383216133/?type=3&theater
-
¿Por qué ocurre la alarma
social en torno a las razas de perros? http://www.fiapbt.net/alarma.html
-
LA PPPRUEBA: http://www.iadcro.com/rsce.html
-
ENTREVISTA de la revista
INTERVIU a MANUEL MARTÍN: http://www.iadcro.com/interviu.html
-
Hubo otros que también
acusaron a MANUEL MARTÍN, pero les hicieron callar: http://www.iadcro.com/martinculpableleyppp.htm
- Listas NEGRAS de razas PPP
contradictorias dependiendo el lugar http://www.iadcro.com/contradicionlistasppp.html
- Una
pequeña parte de la otra historia de España jamás contada. RAICES de la Ley PPP: http://www.iadcro.com/raicesleyppp.html
- ¡¡¡DESENMASCARANDO la Ley PPP!!! PASOS
que se dieron para originarse la Ley PPP: http://www.iadcro.com/pasosLeyppp.html
- “NO existe el derecho a MATAR, existe el
Derecho a VIVIR.”
Ellos también tienen ese
derecho... https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/photos/a.451449941132/10157014181356133/?type=3&theater
La Ley PPP es
una Ley ASESINA que MATA animales, ya que CRIMINALIZA injustificadamente y sin
RIGOR ZOOTÉCNICO alguno a la especie canina. La Ley PPP es una Ley
DISCRIMINATORIA, INJUSTA, INEFICAZ, CRUEL que fomenta la TENENCIA
IRRESPONSABLE. El único objetivo de la Ley PPP es el RECAUDATORIO para los
bolsillos de 4 políticos CORRUPTOS, en lugar de generar SEGURIDAD ciudadana y
animal y todo esto que afirmamos lo hacemos remitiéndonos a los hechos desde
que se creó la Ley PPP hace 20 años, tiempo más que suficiente como para
afirmar sin temor a equivocarnos todo lo anterior. Además los científicos
etólogos y el resto de profesionales en torno al mundo del perro junto con las
estadísticas de ataques de perros a personas nos dan la razón igualmente.
¡¡¡STOP Ley
PPP!!! – ¿Se imaginan ustedes que las Leyes sociales se realizaran por el
aspecto de las personas y no por su mal comportamiento? Esto sería una locura,
una gran INJUSTICIA, totalmente INEFICAZ e incluso una enorme CRUELDAD ante
aquellos a los que se les aplicara dicha Ley solo por su aspecto sin haber
realizado nada malo, ¿No les parece? Pues esta enorme locura INJUSTA,
totalmente INEFICAZ y de enorme CRUELDAD, ¡¡¡Es una REALIDAD!!! https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/photos/a.451449941132/10156965621926133/?type=3&theater
- ¿Razas Caninas Peligrosas???? Cuanta IGNORANCIA rodando… :-) ¡¡¡TODAS las razas caninas son ADORABLES!!!
<3 https://www.facebook.com/FIAPBT/photos/a.451449941132/10157289165496133/?type=3&theater
- La raza
canina American Pit Bull Terrier (APBT o Pit Bull), es de todas aquellas razas
que sufren criminalizaciones y discriminaciones, la raza de perro más
perseguida y más maltratada con diferencia: http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10150709734286133&set=a.451449941132.245086.271421886132&type=3&theater
-
RESCATE
y SALVAMENTO con American
Pit Bull Terrier: http://www.fiapbt.net/rescate.html - http://www.fiapbt.net/reconocimiento.html - http://www.fiapbt.net/16HEROES.html - http://www.fiapbt.net/PITBULLheroes.html
- ¿Qué dicen los CIENTIFICOS ETOLOGOS y el
resto de los PROFESIONALES del mundo canino a cerca de la Ley PPP y las
impuestas razas caninas Peligrosas? www.fiapbt.net/mensajeetologos.html - http://www.villaliberty.org/datoscaninos.html
- ¿Qué es la INJUSTA, INEFICAZ y CRUEL Ley
PPP? https://www.facebook.com/271421886132/photos/a.451449941132.245086.271421886132/10153882085391133/?type=3&theater
- FIAPBT & IADCRO solicitaron al gobierno
de Mariano Rajoy: http://www.iadcro.com/iadcrosolicita.html (Sin contestar) Esta es la manera que
tiene el Gobierno de atender las solicitudes del pueblo. ACLARAR, que la
SACADINEROS, INJUSTA, CRUEL e INEFICAZ Ley PPP fue elaborada y creada en
exclusiva por el PP el partido de Rajoy en 1999. Más tarde la Ley PPP fue
consentida por el PSOE cuando estuvo gobernando, después de que el PSOE
prometiera que la modificarían en positivo y sin discriminar razas cuando
estaba en la oposición y solo ellos sabrán el por qué no cumplieron su palabra
una vez conseguido el poder. El Bipartidismo PPSOE y sus partidos Bisagras, se
encuentran sin palabra, sin DIGNIDAD ni HONOR…
- PROPUESTA de Ley PPP al Gobierno de
España desde la buena intención de ayudar por parte de la FIAPBT e IADCRO: http://www.iadcro.com/leycorrecta.html
La Ley PPP
para que dejase de ser una Ley injusta, cruel, discriminatoria e ineficaz,
debería estar basada fundamentalmente en FOMENTAR la RESPONSABILIDAD del propietario
y juzgar cada caso de accidente por INDIVIDUAL,
sin mirar razas ni tamaños y dejar de una vez por todas de criminalizar sin
razón alguna nobles y maravillosas razas caninas junto con sus propietarios
responsables.
- Los
accidentes de ataques de perro a personas, bajo la óptica de la FIAPBT e
IADCRO: http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151147544121133&set=a.451449941132.245086.271421886132&type=3&theater
- ESTADISTICAS de varios países
(referente a los ataques de perro a personas): http://www.fiapbt.net/estadisticas.html
- Los perros
son agresivos si reciben una mala educación y no por su raza. Investigación
realizada CIENTÍFICAMENTE en la
Universidad de Córdoba: http://www.iadcro.com/estudio.html
- CONCEPTOS PARA DEMANDAR LA LEY
PPP: https://www.facebook.com/271421886132/photos/a.451449941132.245086.271421886132/10154212259826133/?type=3&theater
Da mucho
gusto contemplar como la nueva generación del Pit Bull y de los amantes de los
animales en general, ya vienen pisando fuerte en numerosos lugares del planeta,
ellos son el futuro y la esperanza de esta noble y maravillosa raza canina y de
todos aquellos animales que igualmente sufren DISCRIMINACIONES y MALTRATO
(Perros PPP, Toros, Galgos, Gallos, Delfines, Elefantes, etc.) ¡¡¡GRACIAS!!! http://www.fiapbt.net/manualdefensa.html
- Ariana,
la Pequeña Adiestradora de Pit Bull en Portugal: http://www.fiapbt.net/ariana.html
¡¡¡Estamos en
contra del MALTRATO HUMANO y ANIMAL!!! ¡¡¡STOP CRIMINALIZACIONES y
DISCRIMINACIONES por LEY YA!!! ¡¡¡TODOS estamos RELACIONADOS con TODOS y con
TODO!!! http://www.iadcro.com/nicea.html
&
